Was wir mit dem “deep reading” verlieren könnten, beschrieben von Nicholas Carr

So, yes, you should be skeptical of my skepticism. Perhaps those who dismiss critics of the Internet as Luddites or nostalgists will be proved correct, and from our hyperactive, data-stoked minds will spring a golden age of intellectual discovery and universal wisdom. Then again, the Net isn’t the alphabet, and although it may replace the printing press, it produces something altogether different. The kind of deep reading that a sequence of printed pages promotes is valuable not just for the knowledge we acquire from the author’s words but for the intellectual vibrations those words set off within our own minds. In the quiet spaces opened up by the sustained, undistracted reading of a book, or by any other act of contemplation, for that matter, we make our own associations, draw our own inferences and analogies, foster our own ideas. Deep reading, as Maryanne Wolf argues, is indistinguishable from deep thinking.

In der Juli/August-Ausgabe des Atlantic findet sich ein mächtig Internet-skeptisches und sehr lesenswertes Essai von Nicholas Carr über das WWW als Universalmedium und “pancake-people” (“read wide and thin”): Is Google Making Us Stupid?

1 Response to “Was wir mit dem “deep reading” verlieren könnten, beschrieben von Nicholas Carr”

  1. [...] reflektiert Oliver Jungen über Nicholas Carrs Überlegungen zum uns verdummenden Internet (vgl. hier) und kommt zu der nicht allzu originellen, aber ziemlich nachvollziehen Einsicht, dass es vor allem [...]

Leave a Reply

You must login to post a comment.